Team:Tyngsboro MA Tigers/Notebook

From 2012hs.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(NOTEBOOK)
(NOTEBOOK)
Line 82: Line 82:
1/5/12- Groups presented start-up data on our top three project ideas, and began to look into parts in the registry.  We started a letter to corporate sponsors, and looked into the 3A Assembly Method.
1/5/12- Groups presented start-up data on our top three project ideas, and began to look into parts in the registry.  We started a letter to corporate sponsors, and looked into the 3A Assembly Method.
-
1/12/12- For our next project we each picked an iGEM wiki from 2008-2010, explored the wiki, and summarized what the group did.  We talked about and explored more options for project ideas.
+
1/12/12- For our next project we each picked an iGEM wiki from 2008-2010, explored the wiki, and summarized what the group did.  We talked about and explored more options for project ideas.  We explored ideas involving a carbon monoxide detecting bacteria as we found that most of our other ideas had already been done.
-
1/19/12-
+
1/26/12- Uploaded the information we had gathered so far onto a team Google Docs account in preparation for getting the iGEM wiki, and began preparing the setup of our wiki.  We explored more fundraising ideas, including a Darwin DAy fundraiser and how we'd get funds to travel to Indiana for the Jamboree.  We researched CO stats (deaths, sensor information, etc), parts relating to CO in the registry, and the effects of CO on humans and why it's harmful.
-
 
+
-
1/26/12-
+
2/2/12-
2/2/12-

Revision as of 18:51, 31 May 2012


NOTEBOOK

Finding Our Idea

Our Team meets every Thursday from 2-4pm. Below you will find summaries of our meetings, as well as links to the agenda lists.

10/4/11- We are introduced to the concept of iGEM, and set up a relative calender of when we would have meetings. We received a packet on synthetic biology, the Eau d'coli lab procedure, and our Lab Safety contacts to be returned the next week.

10/11/11 - Sign ups were held for positions within the team (Liaison, Secretary, Media Specialist, Lab Manager, Public Relations,and Treasurer. We also went over past iGEM projects, explored the iGEM website, and went over the Eau d'coli lab notes in preparation for the lab next week.

10/18/11- We collected data for the Eau d'coli lab using our spectrophotometer (Spec 20) and began analysis of our data.

10/25/11- More analysis of Eau d'coli lab results and data, and exploring the meaning of the results.

11/10/11- Individual positions given assignments (such as a newspaper article, fundraising ideas, etc). Smell tests were done on samples of Eau d'coli cells at different growth phases and from different samples, translated our data, and viewed a student-made PowerPoint on the meaning of our results so far. We also explored the BioBuilder site and Parts Registry.

11/17/11- Positions reported on their findings in their assignments, and we received and went over the iTunes lab handout.

12/1/11- Looked into grants for funding lab supplies and brainstormed different methods of public outreach. We began to think of a design for our initial t-shirts. We input our previous data into the BioBuilder site, and began brainstorming what our cell idea would be.

12/8/11- Reports from positions at the beginning of the meeting become standardized, and we begin most meetings now with this. Most of the meeting was spent brainstorming topic and preparing presentations on our findings. Our research categories were Health & Medicine, Food & Energy, and Environment. After we brainstorm on ideas for our first fundraiser.

12/15/11- We narrow our cell ideas down to a top three (home step diagnostic, desalinization, and a converter to make exhaust not harmful to the environment). We worked more on our t-shirt design, and did a sign-up for baked goods and working times for our first fundraiser.

1/5/12- Groups presented start-up data on our top three project ideas, and began to look into parts in the registry. We started a letter to corporate sponsors, and looked into the 3A Assembly Method.

1/12/12- For our next project we each picked an iGEM wiki from 2008-2010, explored the wiki, and summarized what the group did. We talked about and explored more options for project ideas. We explored ideas involving a carbon monoxide detecting bacteria as we found that most of our other ideas had already been done.

1/26/12- Uploaded the information we had gathered so far onto a team Google Docs account in preparation for getting the iGEM wiki, and began preparing the setup of our wiki. We explored more fundraising ideas, including a Darwin DAy fundraiser and how we'd get funds to travel to Indiana for the Jamboree. We researched CO stats (deaths, sensor information, etc), parts relating to CO in the registry, and the effects of CO on humans and why it's harmful.

2/2/12-

2/9/12-

2/16/12-

2/23/12-

3/1/12-

3/8/12-

3/15/12- Our project description was the focus of our meeting... What should be our project title? --should we be boring and say what it does-- what about "An olfactory system for the detection of carbon monoxide"-- should it start with " E. COLi factory:"-- Our final choice is.... "E. COLfactory: A smell test for the detection of carbon monoxide."

3/22/12- As Spring sports begin, we are experiencing a decline in team member attendance to our meetings. Should we consider supplementing our after school meetings with early morning as well? On a high note... we received a generous donation in the amount of $150 from Granite Ridge Energy to help supplement our fundraising efforts! Thank you for your contribution!!!!

3/29/12- We are trying to find a way to safely produce a controlled amount of CO in a lab. We found an experiment online that produced CO using sulfuric acid and formic acid ( H2SO4(l) + HCOOH(l) CO(g) + H2SO4.H2O(l) ) the lab procedure is found here: http://mattson.creighton.edu/CO/index.html

4/5/12-

4/12/12- Today we worked on making our wiki look pretty, researching our genetic circuit, and determining the safety and practicality of using CO in the school. We found an online site NorLab which sold calibration gases and equipment. They sold various quantities of 200ppm and 50ppm CO. According to an online representative, both of these quantities are safe to use and would require no special chamber to use it. They sent us a File:MSDS for CO. We found that when CO detectors are exposed to low concentrations of CO (100ppm)the detector will not sound for 10s of minutes. When the ppm is 400 or greater, the detector will sound in a few minutes. The purpose of this is to mimic the uptake of CO in the body while preventing false alarms due to natural fluctuation.

4/19/12- APRIL Vacation

4/26/12-

5/3/12-

5/10/12-

5/17/12-

5/24/12-

5/31/12-

6/7/12-

6/14/12-

6/21/12-

6/28/12-

Agenda List

Click here to see our CREATING THE GENETIC CIRCUIT page

Return to main page