Team:Heidelberg LSL/Project Introduction
From 2012hs.igem.org
(11 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<p>The basic idea of our project was to create a simple and cheap tool to measure UV-/ radioactive-mediated damage in living cells. | <p>The basic idea of our project was to create a simple and cheap tool to measure UV-/ radioactive-mediated damage in living cells. | ||
- | We developed a biological system in <i>E.coli</i> which can | + | We developed a biological system in <i>E.coli</i> which can detect a broad range of UV-radiation doses. The grade of damage induced can be estimated by means of a color reaction in the bacterial suspension.<br/> |
- | To do so we take advantage of the natural SOS response of <i>E.coli</i>. The SOS | + | To do so we take advantage of the natural SOS response of <i>E.coli</i>. The SOS mechanism is a universal repair system in cells as a response to DNA damage. The mechanisms involved work very efficiently, starting immediately after the DNA was damaged and resulting in precise repair. This is of utmost importance because even small changes (point mutations) in the DNA may have serious consequences. Due to the efficiency of the mechanisms they serve as highly sensitive detector of radiation for us. For details of the mechanism of the SOS response please click <a href="http://2012HS.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg_LSL/Project_SOS">here</a>.<br/> |
We made a construct using a synthetic plasmid backbone with an ori region and a selection marker and inserted one of the promoters of a repair protein, followed by the sequence of an enzyme for the color reaction.</p> | We made a construct using a synthetic plasmid backbone with an ori region and a selection marker and inserted one of the promoters of a repair protein, followed by the sequence of an enzyme for the color reaction.</p> | ||
- | <h4> | + | <h4> Promoters </h4> |
- | <p>We chose to start with the | + | <p>We chose to start with the promoters recA and sulA. These promoters seemed most suitable for our project. |
- | RecA is a recombinase enzyme, i.e. a DNA strand exchange and recombination protein with protease and nuclease activity. It is the standard gene for the SOS-response therefore it is well characterized. Other scientist have been successful when using recA for gene regulation. | + | RecA is a recombinase enzyme, i.e. a DNA strand exchange and recombination protein with protease and nuclease activity. It is the standard gene for the SOS-response therefore it is well characterized. Other scientist have been successful when using recA for gene regulation. The promoter of this gene is easily available through partsregistry: |
<a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K154000">Part:BBa_K154000</a></p> | <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K154000">Part:BBa_K154000</a></p> | ||
- | <p>There is also the possibility to use different members of the same gene family besides precA, | + | <p>There is also the possibility to use different members of the same gene family besides precA, namely precB and precC. This is important for a further approach by using these genes to achieve a more gradual UV response for the detection of UV-intensity. We assumed that increasing DNA damage leads to the successive induction of the different rec promoters.<br/> |
- | The disadvantage of precA was that precA is required for a number of functions in <i>E.coli</i>, not only as part of the SOS response. Therefore, it may be activated even if no radiation is present and might give nonspecific results | + | The disadvantage of precA was that precA is required for a number of functions in <i>E.coli</i>, not only as part of the SOS response. Therefore, it may be activated even if no radiation is present and might give nonspecific results.</p> |
- | <p>SulA is a protein that acts as a cell division inhibitor during SOS-response. | + | <p>SulA is a protein that acts as a cell division inhibitor during SOS-response. In contrast to recA, the promoter of sulA is exclusively activated as part of the SOS-response, thus we assumed that the construct would have less background activity. The promoter of sulA is not available in the parts registry, but oligos can be easily designed and ordered by using the gene code from the partsregistry: <a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K518010">Part:BBa_K518010</a><br /> |
- | + | Like precA also psulA were used by other iGEM teams before.</p> | |
- | <h4> Reporter | + | <h4> Reporter genes </h4> |
- | <p>We have chosen | + | <p>We have chosen lacZ and gfp as the most suitable reporter genes for our project. Compared to GFP the advantage of using LacZ is the conversion of the substrate X-Gal by the beta-galactosidase expressed by the lacZ gene which produces a blue color that can easily be seen by eye. GFP, however, needs to be excited by a certain wavelength (~488 nm) in order to emit green light and its detection requires measuring systems such as fluorescence microscope or flow cytometry.</p> |
- | <h4> Cloning and | + | <h4> Cloning and assembly</h4> |
- | <p>For construction of our plasmids we used parts from the iGEM | + | <p>For construction of our plasmids we used parts from the iGEM partsregistry and applied the iGEM standard assembly strategy. Our first clonings were the sulA promoter with LacZ and GFP reporter genes as well as the recA promoter with LacZ and GFP reporter genes.<br/> |
- | The | + | The plasmids were transformed into the BL21 strain of <i>E.coli</i> and irradiation experiments were performed in triplicates for different time points. In theory, radiation should cause - apart from normal SOS-response activation - the activation of the reporter encoded on the synthetic plasmid and subsequently the expression of beta galactosidase or GFP.</p> |
- | < | + | <h4> Product </h4> |
- | <h2>Scientific | + | <p>Having shown that the system works under laboratory conditions the ultimate goal of our project was to prove its applicability as an detector of harmful UV-radiation emitted by the sun in everyday life. We developed ideas how to use bacterial suspensions in a way that is acceptable for possible consumers. One approach was to develop a plaster but it was rejected because of possible white stripes on the skin when sunbathing. The most promising idea is to develop some kind of jewelry containing the bacterial solution such as a bracelet with a little vial. That is how we came up with <a href="http://2012HS.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg_LSL/Online_store">iGEMS</a>!</p> |
+ | |||
+ | <h2>Scientific background - The SOS response</h2> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
In order to realize our project, we took advantage of the DNA-repair machinery of the bacterium <i>E.coli</i>, the so-called SOS response system. The SOS system is the repair system of the cell to counteract extensive DNA damages e.g. caused by UV radiation or ionizing radiation. If UV radiation impinges on the bacterial DNA it may cause cross-linking of adjacent cytosine and thymine bases resulting in pyrimidine dimers – a process called direct DNA damage. Heavily damaged DNA is no longer able to replicate and leads to interruption of the cell cycle. | In order to realize our project, we took advantage of the DNA-repair machinery of the bacterium <i>E.coli</i>, the so-called SOS response system. The SOS system is the repair system of the cell to counteract extensive DNA damages e.g. caused by UV radiation or ionizing radiation. If UV radiation impinges on the bacterial DNA it may cause cross-linking of adjacent cytosine and thymine bases resulting in pyrimidine dimers – a process called direct DNA damage. Heavily damaged DNA is no longer able to replicate and leads to interruption of the cell cycle. | ||
- | The SOS response allows bacterial cells to repair damaged DNA and continue the cell cycle. In normal cells, the SOS system is turned off and it is only activated in the case of DNA damage. The central regulator of the SOS response is | + | The SOS response allows bacterial cells to repair damaged DNA and continue the cell cycle. In normal cells, the SOS system is turned off and it is only activated in the case of DNA damage. The central regulator of the SOS response is RecA. The RecA protein is activated by single-stranded DNA occurring during heavy DNA damage. Activated RecA leads to the cleavage of the LexA-repressor protein that normally blocks the RNA-polymerase for transcription of repair proteins. The inactivated LexA can no longer bind to the DNA strain which allows for the production of a cascade of about 20 different repair proteins, amongst others SulA, UvrB and DinF. Another action of the active LexA repressor protein is regulation of its own transcription as well as transcription of RecA . When DNA repair is done and the activity of precA has decreased the system returns to its steady state. |
<html> | <html> | ||
Line 68: | Line 70: | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
- | RecA, | + | RecA, LexA, SulA and roughly 15 other proteins make up the SOS response. Amongst 20 different promoters we have chosen precA and psulA for our experiments. We used the following criteria for the selection of the optimal promoters: |
- | *They should be involved in only a few processes in the cell | + | *They should be involved in only a few processes in the cell. |
- | *The promoters should already be well | + | *The promoters should already be well studied and available in the partsregistry. |
- | Only precA and psulA meet these criteria. Although precA has many functions in the cell it is a standard gene for the SOS response and well | + | Only precA and psulA meet these criteria. Although precA has many functions in the cell it is a standard gene for the SOS response and well characterized. |
- | Another desired feature for our project is the ability to detect the amount of UV radiation by changes in the intensity of | + | Another desired feature for our project is the ability to detect the amount of UV radiation by changes in the intensity of color development. Therefore, we are trying to use other rec-proteins besides RecA such as RecB, RecC etc. Our hypothesis is that these rec-proteins may be activated at different UV induced DNA damages. |
<html> | <html> |
Latest revision as of 02:30, 17 June 2012
Introduction
The basic idea of our project was to create a simple and cheap tool to measure UV-/ radioactive-mediated damage in living cells.
We developed a biological system in E.coli which can detect a broad range of UV-radiation doses. The grade of damage induced can be estimated by means of a color reaction in the bacterial suspension.
To do so we take advantage of the natural SOS response of E.coli. The SOS mechanism is a universal repair system in cells as a response to DNA damage. The mechanisms involved work very efficiently, starting immediately after the DNA was damaged and resulting in precise repair. This is of utmost importance because even small changes (point mutations) in the DNA may have serious consequences. Due to the efficiency of the mechanisms they serve as highly sensitive detector of radiation for us. For details of the mechanism of the SOS response please click here.
We made a construct using a synthetic plasmid backbone with an ori region and a selection marker and inserted one of the promoters of a repair protein, followed by the sequence of an enzyme for the color reaction.
Promoters
We chose to start with the promoters recA and sulA. These promoters seemed most suitable for our project. RecA is a recombinase enzyme, i.e. a DNA strand exchange and recombination protein with protease and nuclease activity. It is the standard gene for the SOS-response therefore it is well characterized. Other scientist have been successful when using recA for gene regulation. The promoter of this gene is easily available through partsregistry: Part:BBa_K154000
There is also the possibility to use different members of the same gene family besides precA, namely precB and precC. This is important for a further approach by using these genes to achieve a more gradual UV response for the detection of UV-intensity. We assumed that increasing DNA damage leads to the successive induction of the different rec promoters.
The disadvantage of precA was that precA is required for a number of functions in E.coli, not only as part of the SOS response. Therefore, it may be activated even if no radiation is present and might give nonspecific results.
SulA is a protein that acts as a cell division inhibitor during SOS-response. In contrast to recA, the promoter of sulA is exclusively activated as part of the SOS-response, thus we assumed that the construct would have less background activity. The promoter of sulA is not available in the parts registry, but oligos can be easily designed and ordered by using the gene code from the partsregistry: Part:BBa_K518010
Like precA also psulA were used by other iGEM teams before.
Reporter genes
We have chosen lacZ and gfp as the most suitable reporter genes for our project. Compared to GFP the advantage of using LacZ is the conversion of the substrate X-Gal by the beta-galactosidase expressed by the lacZ gene which produces a blue color that can easily be seen by eye. GFP, however, needs to be excited by a certain wavelength (~488 nm) in order to emit green light and its detection requires measuring systems such as fluorescence microscope or flow cytometry.
Cloning and assembly
For construction of our plasmids we used parts from the iGEM partsregistry and applied the iGEM standard assembly strategy. Our first clonings were the sulA promoter with LacZ and GFP reporter genes as well as the recA promoter with LacZ and GFP reporter genes.
The plasmids were transformed into the BL21 strain of E.coli and irradiation experiments were performed in triplicates for different time points. In theory, radiation should cause - apart from normal SOS-response activation - the activation of the reporter encoded on the synthetic plasmid and subsequently the expression of beta galactosidase or GFP.
Product
Having shown that the system works under laboratory conditions the ultimate goal of our project was to prove its applicability as an detector of harmful UV-radiation emitted by the sun in everyday life. We developed ideas how to use bacterial suspensions in a way that is acceptable for possible consumers. One approach was to develop a plaster but it was rejected because of possible white stripes on the skin when sunbathing. The most promising idea is to develop some kind of jewelry containing the bacterial solution such as a bracelet with a little vial. That is how we came up with iGEMS!
Scientific background - The SOS response
In order to realize our project, we took advantage of the DNA-repair machinery of the bacterium E.coli, the so-called SOS response system. The SOS system is the repair system of the cell to counteract extensive DNA damages e.g. caused by UV radiation or ionizing radiation. If UV radiation impinges on the bacterial DNA it may cause cross-linking of adjacent cytosine and thymine bases resulting in pyrimidine dimers – a process called direct DNA damage. Heavily damaged DNA is no longer able to replicate and leads to interruption of the cell cycle. The SOS response allows bacterial cells to repair damaged DNA and continue the cell cycle. In normal cells, the SOS system is turned off and it is only activated in the case of DNA damage. The central regulator of the SOS response is RecA. The RecA protein is activated by single-stranded DNA occurring during heavy DNA damage. Activated RecA leads to the cleavage of the LexA-repressor protein that normally blocks the RNA-polymerase for transcription of repair proteins. The inactivated LexA can no longer bind to the DNA strain which allows for the production of a cascade of about 20 different repair proteins, amongst others SulA, UvrB and DinF. Another action of the active LexA repressor protein is regulation of its own transcription as well as transcription of RecA . When DNA repair is done and the activity of precA has decreased the system returns to its steady state.
RecA, LexA, SulA and roughly 15 other proteins make up the SOS response. Amongst 20 different promoters we have chosen precA and psulA for our experiments. We used the following criteria for the selection of the optimal promoters:
- They should be involved in only a few processes in the cell.
- The promoters should already be well studied and available in the partsregistry.
Only precA and psulA meet these criteria. Although precA has many functions in the cell it is a standard gene for the SOS response and well characterized. Another desired feature for our project is the ability to detect the amount of UV radiation by changes in the intensity of color development. Therefore, we are trying to use other rec-proteins besides RecA such as RecB, RecC etc. Our hypothesis is that these rec-proteins may be activated at different UV induced DNA damages.
Gene | Repair Function |
lexA | SOS repressor |
recA | SOS regulator; SOS mutagenesis; recF-dependent recombinational repair; recB-dependent repair of double-strand gaps; cross-link repair |
recN | recF-dependent recombinational repair; repair of double-strand gaps |
recQ | recF-dependent recombinational repair |
ruv | recF-dependent recombinational repair |
umuC | SOS mutagenesis (Error prone repair) |
umuD | SOS mutagenesis (Error prone repair) |
uvrA | Short-patch nucleotide-excision repair; long-patch nucleotide-excision repair; cross-link repair |
uvrB | Short-patch nucleotide-excision repair; long-patch nucleotide-excision repair; cross-link repair |
uvrD | Short-patch nucleotide-excision repair; recF-dependent recombinational repair; recB-dependent repair of double-strand gaps; cross-link repair; methylation-directed mismatch repair |
dinA | SOS mutagenesis |
sulA | Inhibitor of cell division |