Team:Heidelberg LSL/Notebook
From 2012hs.igem.org
(242 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | {{ | + | __NOTOC__ |
+ | {{TopII}} | ||
{{Stylesheet}} | {{Stylesheet}} | ||
Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
/--> | /--> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NotebookUpper}} | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<style type="text/css"> | <style type="text/css"> | ||
+ | h3 {font-color: #0066CC;} | ||
+ | </style> | ||
+ | <div id="Scrollbereich"> | ||
+ | <h2><a name="Planning" style="color:#c8da52;">Planning and Development</a></h2> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#c8da52;" name="01/07/2012">01/07/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
- | + | <b>Brainstorming for possible project ideas: </b> | |
- | + | <br /><br /> | |
- | + | <b>Ideas:</b> | |
- | + | *plastics deteriorating bacteria | |
- | + | *anti pus bacteria against acne | |
- | + | *<u>bacterial radiation badge </u> | |
+ | *bacteria which provide lactose intolerant people with lactase | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <b>Members should find out more about the different projects:</b> | ||
+ | *find pros and cons | ||
+ | *did a group already work on these ideas? | ||
+ | *implementation? | ||
+ | *possible BioBricks? | ||
- | a | + | <html> |
- | + | <h4><a style="color:#c8da52;" name="01/21/2012">01/21/2012</a></h4> | |
- | color: # | + | </html> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | <b>Presentation of the information we found:</b> | |
- | + | *vote and decision → our project for iGEM: <u>bacterial radiation badge </u> | |
- | + | <br /> | |
- | + | <b>Finding ideas to realize our project: </b> | |
- | + | *implementing our project using the system of the SOS response | |
+ | => find promoters that are part of the SOS response | ||
+ | *how can we make the DNA damage visible that is caused by radiation? | ||
+ | => looking for appropriate reporter genes<br /><br /> | ||
+ | <b>Work division:</b> | ||
+ | *reporter group | ||
+ | *promoter group | ||
- | + | <html> | |
+ | <h4><a style="color:#c8da52;" name="02/04/2012">02/04/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
- | + | <b>Presentation of results by both groups:</b> | |
- | + | *classification of possible promoters and reporters | |
- | + | *we choose <b>recA- (recB-, recC-, ...) </b>and <b>sulA-promoters</b> and <b>lacZ</b> and <b>GFP</b> as <b>reporters</b> | |
- | + | <br /> | |
- | + | <b>Working out the construction of our plasmids: </b> | |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | </ | + | |
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/a/a8/Plasmide_NB.jpg" width=635> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
- | < | + | <b>Decision on BioBricks we want to order:</b> |
+ | *BBa_K173004 (Beta- galactosidase protein generator) | ||
+ | *BBa_K173004 (not present in any distribution) | ||
+ | *BBa_J22106 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 9N, backbone: pSB1A2, resistance: Amp) | ||
+ | *BBa_E0240 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 12M, backbone: pSB1A2, resistance: Amp) | ||
+ | *pSB1A2 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 11P, resistance: Amp) | ||
+ | *pSB1K3 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 5A, resistance: Kan) | ||
+ | *pSB1C3 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 3A, resistance: Cm) | ||
- | < | + | <html> |
+ | <h4><a style="color:#c8da52;" name="02/06/2012">02/06/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
- | < | + | We got the recA promoter and LacZ reporter as parts from the iGEM Sourjik lab today, that has the iGEM registry in their freezer.<br /> |
+ | <br /> | ||
- | < | + | <html> |
- | < | + | <h4><a style="color:#c8da52;" name="02/19/2012">02/19/2012</a></h4> |
- | < | + | </html> |
- | < | + | |
- | + | <b>To do:</b> | |
- | <a | + | *laboratory planning |
- | <a | + | *looking for appropriate protocols |
- | < | + | *looking for a lab → DKFZ, Heidelberg: Prof. Dr. Stephan Herzig |
- | <a | + | <br /> |
- | </ | + | <b>Problem:</b> SulA is not available at the parts registry → we have to order the sequence of SulA, which was found in the parts registry, as oligos and anneal them to double-stranded DNA. |
- | </ | + | <br /><br /> |
- | </ | + | <b> "Life as a toolkit"</b> <br />Ethically considerations about synthetic biology with Dr. Kartin Platzer and Dr. Markus Thiemel |
- | < | + | |
- | < | + | <html> |
- | < | + | <h4><a style="color:#c8da52;" name="06/02/2012">06/02/2012</a></h4> |
- | <a | + | </html> |
- | < | + | |
- | <a | + | <p><b> Planning of the Wiki</b>:</p> |
- | < | + | * structure |
- | <a | + | * design |
- | </ | + | * header |
- | </ | + | * sub points of the menue |
- | </ | + | * idea of our "Online Store" |
- | < | + | |
- | < | + | <br /> |
- | < | + | |
- | < | + | <p><b> Working on our jewelry </b>:</p> |
- | < | + | * idea with small tubes, which are filled with our bacterial suspension |
- | < | + | * design of bracelets and necklaces for men and women |
- | < | + | * tinkering of jewelry |
- | < | + | * taking photographs of the collection |
- | </ | + | |
- | </ | + | <html> |
- | </td> | + | <h4><a style="color:#c8da52;" name="06/09/2012">06/09/2012</a></h4> |
- | </tr> | + | </html> |
+ | |||
+ | <p><b> Working in groups</b>:</p> | ||
+ | * working on the Wiki | ||
+ | ** Online Store | ||
+ | *** Check Out | ||
+ | ** Notebook | ||
+ | *** design | ||
+ | *** content | ||
+ | ** Project | ||
+ | *** Introduction | ||
+ | *** Results | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h2><a name="Construction" style="color:#168dc4;">Biosensor Construction</a></h2> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="02/23/2012">02/23/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | *<b>Transformation of GFP (BBa_ E0240) and RecA (BBa_J22106) from registry 2010 spring distribution into <i>E.coli</i> Top10 cells</b><br /><br /> | ||
+ | <b>Protocol:</b><br /> | ||
+ | 10 ul water is added to the corresponding well, DNA is solved by incubation for 15 min at room temperature. 5 ul of DNA solution are added to 50 µl of chemocompetent Top10 cells and incubated on ice for 20 min. Afterwards, a heat shock is performed by incubation the bacteria on 42°C/50 s. After another 2 min on ice, the bacteria are plated onto LB-Amp agar plates. | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="02/24/2012">02/24/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | *Inoculation of overnight cultures by picking one single colony from the transformed plates and adding it to 5 ml LB-Amp in a 50 ml falcon tube. The culture is incubated at 37 °C at 180 rpm. | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | *Inoculation of LacZ (BBa_K173004) that we got from the registry through the Sourjik Lab on campus as agar stab into 5 ml LB Amp overnight culture | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="02/25/2012">02/25/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | *<b>Miniprep of parts BBa_K173004,BBa_ E0240 and BBa_J22106 by using a Qiagen Miniprep Kit</b><br/> | ||
+ | <b>Protocol:</b> | ||
+ | 4 ml bacterial culture is pelleted by centrifugation at 10.000 rpm for 1 min. Afterwards, the pellet is resuspended in 250 µl buffer P1. 250 µl buffer P2 are added and the culture is gently inverted and incubated for 5 min. 350 µl buffer N3 are added and the suspension is centrifuged at 13.000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant is subsequently loaded onto a miniprep column and centrifuged for 1 min/max speed. Afterwards the column is washed with buffer PB (500 µl) and buffer PE (750 µl) by loading onto the column and subsequent centrifugation for 1 min/max speed. After a last centrifugation step for drying the column (again 1 min/max speed), 50 µl of water are added in order to dissolve the DNA again. After 1 min incubation, DNA is eluted by centrifugation for 1 min/max speed.<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | *<b>Measurement of DNA concentration at the Nanodrop microphotometer device</b> | ||
+ | 1 µl of water is used as blank. Subsequently, the miniprep cultures ( 1µl each) were loaded onto the Nanodrop device in order to determine the concentration and purity of the DNA in the samples. Concentrations ranged from 70 ng/µl to 300 ng/µl<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <table style="margin:15px;border-collapse:collapse"> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:2px solid black">Part</td><td style="padding:5px;border:2px solid black">DNA concentration</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">GFP</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">148,52 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">LacZ</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">361,65 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">RecA</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">98,61 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | *<b>Digestion of Minipreps for further cloning</b> | ||
+ | We used the NEB restriction enzymes and buffers for setting up the digestions. Those were done as follows: | ||
+ | ** 1 µg of DNA | ||
+ | ** 3 µl of NEB buffer 2 | ||
+ | ** 3 µl of BSA | ||
+ | ** 1 µl of each restriction enzyme used | ||
+ | ** Water was added to reach a final volume of 30 µl | ||
+ | GFP (BBa_ E0240) and LacZ (BBa_K173004) were digested with EcoRI and XbaI. RecA (BBa_J22106) was digested with EcoRI and SpeI. After setting up the digestions, the reaction mixtures were mixed briefly, spinned down in a centrifuge (quick run up to 5.000 rpm) and then incubated on a thermomixer heating device for 1 h at 37 °C and stored at -20 °C afterwards.<br /> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | *<b>Annealing of SulA oligos:</b><br/> | ||
+ | psulA_fw: | ||
+ | <p style="font-family:monospace;margin:10px">aattcgcggccgcttctagaggggttgatctttgttgtcactggatgtactgtacatccaactcacc</p> | ||
+ | psulA_rev: | ||
+ | <p style="font-family:monospace;margin:10px">ctagggtgagttactgtatggatgtacagtacatccagtgacaacaaagatcaacccctctagaagcggccgcg</p> | ||
+ | The Oligos for the synthesis of the sulA-promoter were designed according to the sequence available in the partsregistry (BBa_K518010). By annealing of the oligos and ligation into a EcoRI/XbaI precut biobrick construct, they reconstitute the biobrick standard prefix completely and introduce the SulA promoter sequence.<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <b>Protocol:</b> | ||
+ | 5 µl of each oligo (diluted to a concentration of 100 mM) and 5 µl of NEB buffer 2 were added to 35 µl of water. After mixing, the reaction mix was heated up to 95 °C/5 min and then cooled down slowly to room temperature and then stored at -20 °C. | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="03/10/2012">03/10/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | * <b><i>Information:</i> Standard cloning - our Strategy </b> | ||
+ | **GFP and LacZ were digested with EcoRI (E) and Xbal (X) | ||
+ | **precA was digested with EcoRI and SpeI (S) | ||
+ | **psulA was annealed, so it has the overhangs for EcoRI (as well as the whole BBa prefix) and a XbaI compatible overhang | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
- | < | + | <html> |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/3/3b/StdAss-edited.png" width=635> | ||
+ | </html><br/> | ||
- | < | + | *<b>Gelelectrophoresis of the digested biobrick parts in order to extract the GFP and LacZ backbone as well as precA</b><br/> |
+ | <b>Protocol:</b> | ||
+ | In the meantime, the restriction digests were mixed with 6 µl of 6 x Loading Dye (fermentas). The whole restriction digest was loaded onto a 1 % agarose gel. Therefore, the agarose gel was prepared by adding 2 g of agarose to 200 ml of 1x TBE buffer and heated up in a microwave for 2 min/600 W. Thereby, the agarose was melted. Afterwards, the gel was stirred on a magnetic stirring device until the solution reached ~ 60°C and then the gel was poured. 10 µl of ethidium bromide were subsequently added by our supervisor Katharina Genreith (as EtBr is very toxic, we preferred our supervisor to do the handling of that when running a gel for the first time). | ||
+ | The samples were then loaded on the gel together with 1kb plus loading ladder (fermentas) and run for 1 h @ 100V. The expected bands can be seen on fig. 1.<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <html><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/b/b7/Exp_gel.png" /><br/> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 1: Schema of the gel we expect based on the length</b>(picture constructed using the WinSerial Cloner software)<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/8/84/Gelelektrophorese.jpg" width ="500px" /><br/> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 2: Picture taken of the gel.</b> All expected bands are visible<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | *<b>Gel extraction of the indicated band (backbones for LacZ and GFP as well as precA insert) was done using a Qiagen gel extraction kit.</b><br/> | ||
+ | <b>Protocol:</b> | ||
+ | The bands were cut of the gel under UV light (caution: wear goggles in order to protect your eyes!) using a scalpel and the extracted band was put into a 2 ml eppi cup.<br/> | ||
+ | <br/><html> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/a/aa/Gelelektrophoresenachher.jpg" width ="500px" /><br/> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 3: Picture taken of the cut gel.</b> This picture was taken after the required bands were excised for gel extraction<br/> | ||
+ | <br/></html> | ||
+ | Afterwards, 600 µl of buffer QG were added to each gel band and the mixture was incubated on a thermomixer device at 50 °C and 700 rpm shaking for 20 min. Afterwards, 200 µl of Isopropanol were added to the mix containing precA (as precA is pretty short compared to the others, isopropanol is required). Afterwards, the whole reaction mix was loaded onto a gel extraction column and centrifuged for 1 min/max speed; flow-through was discarded. The column was subsequently washed with 500 µl of buffer QG and then 750 µl buffer PE, always centrifuging the column at max speed for 1 min at each washing step and discarding the flow-through. Finally, DNA was eluted in 20 µl of water.<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | *<b>Concentration measurement of the pre-cut parts using Nanodrop</b> | ||
- | < | + | <table style="margin:15px;border-collapse:collapse"> |
- | < | + | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:2px solid black">Part</td><td style="padding:5px;border:2px solid black">DNA concentration</td></tr> |
- | + | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">GFP</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">12.5 ng/µl</td></tr> | |
- | </ | + | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">LacZ</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">15.11 ng/µl</td></tr> |
- | < | + | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">RecA</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">6.0 ng/µl</td></tr> |
- | < | + | </table> |
- | + | <html> | |
- | </ | + | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="03/13/2012">03/13/2012</a></h4> |
- | < | + | </html> |
- | < | + | *Ligation reactions were set up using 3-6 fold access of insert (precA) and 50 ng of each backbone (roughly). |
- | + | ***precA-GFP: 4 µl (~50 ng) GFP-backbone + 1,5 µl (~9 ng) RecA + 2 µl T4 DNA ligase buffer + 11,5 µl water + 1 µl T4 ligase | |
- | </ | + | ***precA-LacZ: 3 µl (~50 ng) LacZ-backbone + 1,5 µl (~9 ng) RecA + 2 µl T4 DNA ligase buffer + 12 µl water + 1 µl T4 ligase |
- | < | + | ***psulA-GFP: 4 µl (~50 ng) GFP-backbone + 1 µl annealed SulA-oligos + 2 µl buffer + 12 µl water + 1 µl T4 ligase |
- | < | + | ***psulA-LacZ: 3 µl (~50 ng) LacZ-backbone + 1 µl annealed SulA-oligos + 2 µl buffer + 13 µl water + 1 µl T4 ligase |
- | + | **Incubation for 50 min at room temperature | |
- | </ | + | **Heat inactivation of the T4 ligase at 70 °C for 5 min |
- | < | + | *Afterwards, 10 µl of the ligation mix (chilled) were used for transforming 50 µl of <i>E. coli</i> Top10 chemocompetent cells. |
- | <b> | + | <html> |
- | + | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="03/14/2012">03/14/2012</a></h4> | |
- | </ | + | </html> |
- | < | + | *<b>Screening of the four different biobrick clonings done by colony-PCR.</b><br/> |
- | < | + | <b>Protocol:</b><br/> |
- | + | A reaction mix was prepared containing 0.2 µl of each screening primer used for the screening, 9.6 µl of water and 10 µl of 2x PCR mastermix (fermentas). Finally, a colony was picked from a plate using a sterile pipette tip and was dipped into the PCR mix a few times. 7-8 clones were screened for each different cloning setup as follows:<br/> | |
- | </ | + | **<u>psulA-GFP and psulA-LacZ:</u> primers psulA_fw and VR (standard sequencing primer) were used. Only in case psulA was successfully cloned into the backbone containing the reporter gene, we would get a PCR product. GFP would give a product of roughly 1000 bp, LacZ one of roughly 3500 bp.<br/> |
- | < | + | **<u>precA-GFP and precA-LacZ:</u> primers VF2 and VR (standard sequencing primers) were used. We compared the product size of the different clones to the product size from the original vectors from the registry (only containing recA or LacZ). In case the cloning was successful, we should see a 200 bp shift in product size, which can be detected by gel electrophoresis.<br/> |
- | < | + | The PCR program was done as follows:<br/> |
- | + | <p style="font-family:monospace">94°C/3min||94°C/30s|60°C/30s|72°C/3min 45s||30x 72°C/10min|4°C/forever</p> | |
- | </ | + | Afterwards, 3 ul PCR product were loaded onto a 1 % agarose gel.<br/> |
- | < | + | <br/> |
- | <b> | + | <html> |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | </ | + | <img class="gelimage" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/e/e6/RecA_GFP_gel.png" width ="500px"/><br/> |
- | < | + | <b>Fig. 1 Colony-PCR screen of precA-GFP construct.</b> No detectable shift of any screened clone can be seen compared to the control. Screen has to be repeated.<br/> |
- | <b> | + | <br/> |
- | + | <img class="gelimage" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/2/23/RecA_LacZ_gel.png" width="500"/><br/> | |
- | </ | + | <b>Fig. 2 Colony-PCR screen of precA-LacZ construct.</b> Most clones show a small shift upwards in product length. Furthermore, they show a second band at 1200 bp, probably due to unspecific primer binding.<br/> |
- | < | + | <br/> |
- | <b> | + | <img class="gelimage" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/b/b0/SulA_GFP-LacZ_gel.png"/><br/> |
- | + | <b>Fig. 3 Colony-PCR screen of psulA-GFP (#3.1-3.8) and psulA-LacZ (#4.1-4.8).</b> Only clones containing the psulA promoter can give a PCR product of 1000 bp (psulA_GFP) or 3700 bp (psulA_LacZ). Positive clones are i.e. #3.4, #4.2, #4.8.<br/> | |
- | </ | + | </html> |
- | < | + | <br/> |
- | <b> | + | The screening gave positive clones for all constructs (fig. 2, fig. 3), but not the precA_GFP construct (fig. 1). Therefore this screen has to be repeated using a larger number of colonies.<br/> |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | </ | + | *<b>5 ml LB-Amp overnight cultures were inoculated for clones #2.3, #3.4 and #4.8.</b> |
- | < | + | <html> |
- | <b> | + | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="03/15/2012">03/15/2012</a></h4> |
- | + | </html> | |
- | </ | + | *The colony-PCR for the precA_GFP construct was repeated, now screening a number of 31 colonies. As control, again the amplicon of the original GFP biobrick was used.<br/> |
- | < | + | <br/> |
- | < | + | <html><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/3/3f/RecA_GFP_rep_gel.png" /></html><br/> |
- | + | <b>Fig. 1 Repetition of colony-PCR for precA_GFP construct.</b> Clones #6, 18 and 26 were positive (shift in amplicon length of ~200 bp).<br/> | |
- | </ | + | <br/> |
- | < | + | 3 positive colonies were detected, as they show a shift in band size of ~ 200 bp as expected by the introduction of the recA-promoter. Those were clones # 6, 18 and 26.<br/> |
- | <b> | + | <br/> |
- | + | *O/n LB-amp cultures were inoculated for clones #18 and #26.<br/> | |
- | < | + | <br/> |
- | < | + | *Miniprep of the o/n cultures inoculated the day before for clones #2.3, 3.4 and 4.8 were done.<br/> |
- | < | + | **concentrations measured using Nanodrop are all in between 70 and 140 ng/µl<br/> |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | </ | + | *Test digestions were performed in order to detect, whether the constructs would give the expected band patterns on the gel. |
- | < | + | **<nowiki>#2.3 with EcoRI/BglI; as control the original LacZ biobrick was digested EcoRI/BgII as well</nowiki> |
- | < | + | **<nowiki>#3.4 and #4.8 were digested NotI in order to see, whether an insert is present</nowiki><br/> |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | < | + | <html><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/0/01/Test_dig_1_gel.png" width=635 /></html><br/> |
- | < | + | <b>Fig. 2 Test digestions for the constructs recA_LacZ (#2.3), psulA_GFP (#3.4) and sulA_LacZ (#4.8).</b> All constructs digested showed the right bands (left gel compared to virtual gel with expected bands on the right). Construct #2.3 gave the expected shift of the lowest band (arrow) compared to the LacZ-control construct (original biobrick BBa_K173004) due to the presence of the precA promoter. |
- | < | + | <html> |
- | + | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="03/16/2012">03/16/2012</a></h4> | |
- | </ | + | </html> |
- | < | + | *Miniprep of precA_GFP clones #18 and #26 inoculated the previous |
- | < | + | **Measurement of DNA concentration with the Nanodrop gave 71 ng/ul for both constructs<br/> |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | </ | + | *Test digestion of 1 ug of #18 and #26 with EcoRI/NcoI |
+ | **Band correct for both constructs | ||
+ | <html><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/2/2b/Test_dig_2_gel.png" width="200"/></html><br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | *All constructs (clones #1.18, 2.3, 3.4, 4.8) were send for sequencing to GATC using standard biobrick sequencing primer VF2 | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="03/17/2012">03/17/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | *Sequencing results were obtained from GATC for the first 4 Biobricks we did | ||
+ | **Sequence was confirmed for all 4 constructs; cloning was successful! | ||
+ | <table style="margin:15px;border-collapse:collapse"> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:2px solid black">Part</td><td style="padding:5px;border:2px solid black">DNA Confirmation</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">RecA-GFP</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">OK</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">RecA-LacZ</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">OK</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">SulA-GFP</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">OK</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">SulA-LacZ</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">OK</td></tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="05/08/2012">05/08/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
- | < | + | <b>Anealing of oligos for precB and precC:</b> |
- | + | ||
- | </ | + | |
+ | Got oligo sequences from <html><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/">pubmed</a></html> | ||
+ | (looked for appropriate ATG and then took the following 70 basepairs as promoter sequence) | ||
- | < | + | <b>RecB:</b><br/> |
- | + | fwd.: | |
- | + | <p style="font-family:monospace;margin:10px">aattcgcggccgcttctagagCCTGAAGGCTGGAAAGTGTGGGAGAACGTCAGCGCGTTGCAGCAAACAATGCCCCTGATGAGTGAAAAGAc</p> | |
- | + | rev.: | |
- | + | <p style="font-family:monospace;margin:10px">ctaggTCTTTTCACTCATCAGGGGCATTGTTTGCTGCAACGCGCTGACGTTCTCCCACACTTTCCAGCCTTCAGGctctagaagcggccgcg</p> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | </ | + | |
- | < | + | |
- | + | <b>RecC:</b><br/> | |
- | + | fwd.: | |
- | + | <p style="font-family:monospace;margin:10px">aattcgcggccgcttctagagTTCACCCGGGGGCAGAGAAGGCGAGATGACCCGCCTGCATTGCCCGAATCGTCAGTAGTCAGGAGCCGCTc</p> | |
- | + | rev.: | |
- | + | <p style="font-family:monospace;margin:10px">ctaggAGCGGCTCCTGACTACTGACGATTCGGGCAATGCAGGCGGGTCATCTCGCCTTCTCTGCCCCCGGGTGAActctagaagcggccgcg</p> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | Anealing-Protocol: | |
- | + | *5 ul of each oligo (diluted to a concentration of 100 mM) | |
- | + | *5 ul of NEB buffer 2 | |
- | + | *35 ul of water | |
- | + | *Mix | |
- | + | *Heat up reaction mix to 95 °C for 5 minutes | |
- | + | *Cool down slowly to room temperature (then store at -20 °C) | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | <b>Ligation precB_LacZ / precC_lacZ:</b> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | Add contents in the following order: | |
- | + | *12 ul water | |
- | + | *2 ul T4 DNA ligase buffer | |
- | + | *4 ul LacZ-backbone | |
- | + | *1 ul precB / precC | |
- | + | *1 ul T4 ligase | |
- | + | *leave 20 minutes at room temperature | |
- | + | *heat up to ca. 70°C to destroy ligase-enzymes | |
- | + | ||
- | </ | + | <b>Transformation of precB_LacZ / precC_LacZ into Top10:</b> |
+ | |||
+ | *Transformation-protocoll missing! | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="05/26/2012">05/26/2012</a></h4> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Colony PCR:</b><br/> | ||
+ | Screening of the two different biobrick clonings done by colony-PCR. | ||
+ | <br/><br/> | ||
+ | <b>Protocol:</b><br> A reaction mix was prepared containing 0.2 µl of each screening primer used for the screening, 9.6 µl of water and 10 µl of 2x PCR mastermix (fermentas). Finally, a colony was picked from a plate using a sterile pipette tip and was dipped into the PCR mix a few times. 12 clones were screened for each different cloning setup as follows:<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <u>precB_LacZ</u>: primers VF2: and precB Reverse: were used. Only in case precB was successfully cloned into the backbone containing the reporter gene, we would get a PCR product. | ||
+ | <br/><br/> | ||
+ | <u>precC_LacZ</u>: primers VF2 and VR (standard sequencing primers) were used. We compared the product size of the different clones to the product size from the original vectors from the registry (only containing precA or LacZ). In case the cloning was successful, we should see a 200 bp shift in product size, which can be detected by gel electrophoresis. | ||
+ | <br/><br/> | ||
+ | <b>The PCR program was done as follows:</b><br/> | ||
+ | 94°C/3min||94°C/30s|60°C/30s|72°C/3min 45s||30x 72°C/10min|4°C/forever | ||
+ | Afterwards, 3 µl PCR product were loaded onto a 1 % agarose gel. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="05/28/2012">05/28/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Transferring the parts into standard registry plasmid pSB1C3:</b> | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Restriction digest of 1 µg of each sample and of the standard backbone | ||
+ | *After 30 min SapI is added to the backbone digest | ||
+ | *After overall 60 min Qiagen nucleotide removal kit was used to purify DNA | ||
+ | *heat inactivation of remaining enzymes at 80°C | ||
+ | *concentration measurement with nanodrop | ||
+ | *Ligation | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | *heat inactivation at 70°C | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="06/02/2012-con">06/02/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Inoculate:</b><br/><br/> | ||
+ | <u>Protocol</u>: Constructs grown as overnightculture on agarplates: | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | * #5 <html><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K862000"> precA_LacZ</a></html> | ||
+ | * #7 <html><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K862001"> psulA_LacZ</a></html> | ||
+ | * #8 <html><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K862002"> precB_LacZ</a></html> | ||
+ | * #9 precC_LacZ<br/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | A reaction mix was prepared containing 20 ml LB medium and 20 µl Chloramphenicol (50mg/µl). Finally a single blue colony (except for #9) was picked from an agar plate using a sterile pipette tip and was dropped into a tube with 2 ml of the reaction mix.<br/> | ||
+ | Except for #9 we picked two colonies of each plate and inoculated separately. For plate #9, we picked four white colonies to check for basal expression.<br/> | ||
+ | After picking the colonies the tubes, in which the pipette tips where dropped, were put into 20 ml LB Medium .<br/> | ||
+ | Several hours later a miniprep of the grown cultures with the Qiagen Kit followed. DNA was eluted in TE Buffer.<br/> | ||
+ | Measurement of DNA concentration with Nanodrop:<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <table style="margin:15px;border-collapse:collapse"> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:2px solid black">Part</td><td style="padding:5px;border:2px solid black">DNA concentration</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">#5.1</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">16 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">#5.2</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">6 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">#7.1</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">46 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">#7.2</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">57 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">#8.1</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">84 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
+ | <tr><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">#8.2</td><td style="padding:5px;border:1px solid black">91 ng/µl</td></tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#168dc4;" name="06/07/2012">06/07/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <p><b>Three parts were sent to the parts registry</b>: | ||
+ | You can find all BioBricks under: <a href="http://2012HS.igem.org/Team:Heidelberg_LSL/Parts"> Parts </a> </p> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h2><a name="Calibration" style="color:#130ed2;">Calibration and Characterization</a></h2> | ||
+ | <br /> | ||
+ | <h4><a name="04/27/2012">04/27/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Transformation of <i>E.coli</i> strain BL21 (DE3) with our constructs the samples were plated on LB agarplates with Ampicillin. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#130ed2;" name="04/28/2012">04/28/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Inoculation of overnight cultures in LB liquid medium with Amp from the plates. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#130ed2;" name="04/29/2012">04/29/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b> Experiment 1: </b><br/> | ||
+ | *day culture was inoculated with 1:30 dilution of overnight culture in LB with Ampicillin | ||
+ | *day culture was incubated for 3 h | ||
+ | *measurement of optical density using a photometer at 600 nm to confirm bacterial growth | ||
+ | *distribution of each 3 ml per sample to 6-well-plates | ||
+ | *7 replicate plates one per time span: 0 s, 5 s, 10 s, 30 s, 5 min, 10 min of exposure time | ||
+ | *Exposure to UV-light in the Intas gel IX imager with the above-mentioned time spans | ||
+ | *Addition of 30 µl X-Gal (2mg/ ml) to samples #5, #7 (constructs containing LacZ) plates sealed with parafilm | ||
+ | *Incubation at 37°C, 50 rpm for 45 min, visual color change: LacZ samples became blue | ||
+ | *measurement of optical density at 600 nm of #5 and #7<br/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Problem: maximum absorption of X-Gal at 615-650 nm interferes with measurement of bacterial density at 600 nm – no change in absorption although blue colour was visible | ||
+ | <br/><br/> | ||
+ | <b> Experiment 2: </b><br/> | ||
+ | *overnight cultures centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 7 min | ||
+ | *pellet resuspended in 25 ml LB Amp | ||
+ | *The bacterial suspension is again exposed to UV-light with time spans of 0s, 20s, 60s, 300s, 600s. | ||
+ | *After the exposure X-Gal is added to the samples. Incubation at 37°C, 80 rpm | ||
+ | *first visible color change after 5 min in #7, #5 with X-Gal | ||
+ | *for a quantification the assays were plated out with duplicates on a 96w-Plate. LB medium was used as a blank reference. ONPG was added and the absorbance was measured with the plate reader | ||
+ | *ONPG was used because its absorbance maximum differs from the wavelength you use to measure the optical density | ||
+ | *after that we measured the optical density of our samples using the photometer to get the true expression. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/8/80/Bildschirmfoto_2012-06-11_um_23.47.05.png" width="500"/> </center> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#130ed2;" name="05/27/2012">05/27/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Repetition of the second experiment at 29/04/2012.<br/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | *overnight cultures centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 7 min | ||
+ | |||
+ | *pellet resuspended in 25 ml LB Amp<br/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | *The bacterial suspension is again exposed to UV-light with time spans of 10min 8min 6min 4min 2min 0min | ||
+ | |||
+ | *After the exposure X-Gal is added to the samples. Incubation at 37°C, 80rpm | ||
+ | |||
+ | <u>Experiment failed.</u><br/> | ||
+ | No clear graduation between the samples of different exposure times was observed.<br/> | ||
+ | <u>Possible causes</u>: big differences in incubation time after exposure<br/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Improvements in 4. experiment:</b><br/> | ||
+ | *24 wellplate recA and sulA | ||
+ | *for 5 min in UV light then the first row was transfered to another well-plate. The rest went again for 5 min under UV light, then the second row, with now an time period of 10 min. | ||
+ | *Same procedure for all the other rows. Time periods 5min 10min 15min 20min 30min and a controll sample with 0min | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/7/7f/Bildschirmfoto_2012-06-12_um_00.03.28.png" width="635"/></html> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 1: Picture of the color gradient visible in the X-Gal assays with different exposure times</b> | ||
+ | <b>Testing of the precA_GFP construct</b><br/> | ||
+ | *Overnight culture of precA_GFP was diluted 1:5 | ||
+ | *3ml of the culture were induced by UV radiation in the gel chamber for 30min | ||
+ | *The induced culture and 3ml of uninduced culture were incubated for 30min at 37°C / 80rpm | ||
+ | *After the incubation both cultures were compared using the fluorescence microscope | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/6/6f/GFP_Measurement.PNG" width="635"/><br/> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 2: Results of the GFP samples underneath fluorescence microscope</b> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#130ed2;" name="05/28/2012-cal">05/28/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <b> Testing under real life conditions: </b> | ||
+ | *culture of precA_LacZ and psulA_LacZ was centrifuged at 4000rpm for 8 min | ||
+ | *pellet was resuspended in LB Amp | ||
+ | *the samples were put into 2 6-well plates (3 ml/well) | ||
+ | *plates were tightly sealed, desinfected and put outdoor either into the sun or shadow for 75 min | ||
+ | *after 30 min incubation X-Gal was added to final concentration of 200 µg/ml the coloring of the samples were observed over time; intensity of the coloring in the wells were measured using the ImageJ software package | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/f/f9/Outdoor-Test.png" width=635> </img> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <h4><a style="color:#130ed2;" name="06/07/2012-cal">06/07/2012</a></h4> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Overnight cultures precB_LacZ were diluted 1:2 with LB Medium and transferred onto 24-well-plates, 500 µl per well. Duplicates were exposed to UV-radiation in the UV-chamber for 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min. <br/> | ||
+ | X-Gal stock solution was diluted 1:100.<br/> | ||
+ | After 1h incubation 50µl X-Gal was added to final concentration of 200 µg/ml. The coloring of the samples were observed over time. Intensity of the coloring in the wells were measured using the imageJ software package.<br/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012hs/c/c7/XGAL_Measurement.PNG" width="635" /><br/> | ||
+ | <b>Fig. 1: All constructs in comparison</b> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NotebookLower}} | ||
+ | /b> | ||
+ | 4 ml bacterial culture is pelleted by centrifugation at 10.000 rpm for 1 min. Afterwards, the pellet is resuspended in 250 µl buffer P1. 250 µl buffer P2 are added and the culture is gently inverted and incubated for 5 min. 350 µl buffer N3 are added and the suspension is centrifuged at 13.000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant is subsequently loaded onto a miniprep column and centrifuged for 1 min/max speed. Afterwards the column is washed with buffer PB (500 µl) and buffer PE (750 µl) by loading onto the column and subsequent centrifugation for 1 min/max speed. After a last centrifugation step for drying the column (again 1 min/max speed), 50 µl of water are added in order to dissolve the DNA again. After 1 min incubation, DNA is eluted by centrifugation for 1 min/max speed. |
Latest revision as of 03:26, 17 June 2012
Notebook
Welcome to our notebook!
Here you will find the documentation of our laboratory work of the last few month in diary form. This notebook comprises the work in three phases:
|
|
|
Planning and Development
01/07/2012
Brainstorming for possible project ideas:
Ideas:
- plastics deteriorating bacteria
- anti pus bacteria against acne
- bacterial radiation badge
- bacteria which provide lactose intolerant people with lactase
Members should find out more about the different projects:
- find pros and cons
- did a group already work on these ideas?
- implementation?
- possible BioBricks?
01/21/2012
Presentation of the information we found:
- vote and decision → our project for iGEM: bacterial radiation badge
Finding ideas to realize our project:
- implementing our project using the system of the SOS response
=> find promoters that are part of the SOS response
- how can we make the DNA damage visible that is caused by radiation?
=> looking for appropriate reporter genes
Work division:
- reporter group
- promoter group
02/04/2012
Presentation of results by both groups:
- classification of possible promoters and reporters
- we choose recA- (recB-, recC-, ...) and sulA-promoters and lacZ and GFP as reporters
Working out the construction of our plasmids:
Decision on BioBricks we want to order:
- BBa_K173004 (Beta- galactosidase protein generator)
- BBa_K173004 (not present in any distribution)
- BBa_J22106 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 9N, backbone: pSB1A2, resistance: Amp)
- BBa_E0240 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 12M, backbone: pSB1A2, resistance: Amp)
- pSB1A2 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 11P, resistance: Amp)
- pSB1K3 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 5A, resistance: Kan)
- pSB1C3 (2011 spring distribution, kit plate 1, well 3A, resistance: Cm)
02/06/2012
We got the recA promoter and LacZ reporter as parts from the iGEM Sourjik lab today, that has the iGEM registry in their freezer.
02/19/2012
To do:
- laboratory planning
- looking for appropriate protocols
- looking for a lab → DKFZ, Heidelberg: Prof. Dr. Stephan Herzig
Problem: SulA is not available at the parts registry → we have to order the sequence of SulA, which was found in the parts registry, as oligos and anneal them to double-stranded DNA.
"Life as a toolkit"
Ethically considerations about synthetic biology with Dr. Kartin Platzer and Dr. Markus Thiemel
06/02/2012
Planning of the Wiki:
- structure
- design
- header
- sub points of the menue
- idea of our "Online Store"
Working on our jewelry :
- idea with small tubes, which are filled with our bacterial suspension
- design of bracelets and necklaces for men and women
- tinkering of jewelry
- taking photographs of the collection
06/09/2012
Working in groups:
- working on the Wiki
- Online Store
- Check Out
- Notebook
- design
- content
- Project
- Introduction
- Results
- Online Store
Biosensor Construction
02/23/2012
- Transformation of GFP (BBa_ E0240) and RecA (BBa_J22106) from registry 2010 spring distribution into E.coli Top10 cells
Protocol:
10 ul water is added to the corresponding well, DNA is solved by incubation for 15 min at room temperature. 5 ul of DNA solution are added to 50 µl of chemocompetent Top10 cells and incubated on ice for 20 min. Afterwards, a heat shock is performed by incubation the bacteria on 42°C/50 s. After another 2 min on ice, the bacteria are plated onto LB-Amp agar plates.
02/24/2012
- Inoculation of overnight cultures by picking one single colony from the transformed plates and adding it to 5 ml LB-Amp in a 50 ml falcon tube. The culture is incubated at 37 °C at 180 rpm.
- Inoculation of LacZ (BBa_K173004) that we got from the registry through the Sourjik Lab on campus as agar stab into 5 ml LB Amp overnight culture
02/25/2012
- Miniprep of parts BBa_K173004,BBa_ E0240 and BBa_J22106 by using a Qiagen Miniprep Kit
Protocol:
4 ml bacterial culture is pelleted by centrifugation at 10.000 rpm for 1 min. Afterwards, the pellet is resuspended in 250 µl buffer P1. 250 µl buffer P2 are added and the culture is gently inverted and incubated for 5 min. 350 µl buffer N3 are added and the suspension is centrifuged at 13.000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant is subsequently loaded onto a miniprep column and centrifuged for 1 min/max speed. Afterwards the column is washed with buffer PB (500 µl) and buffer PE (750 µl) by loading onto the column and subsequent centrifugation for 1 min/max speed. After a last centrifugation step for drying the column (again 1 min/max speed), 50 µl of water are added in order to dissolve the DNA again. After 1 min incubation, DNA is eluted by centrifugation for 1 min/max speed.
- Measurement of DNA concentration at the Nanodrop microphotometer device
1 µl of water is used as blank. Subsequently, the miniprep cultures ( 1µl each) were loaded onto the Nanodrop device in order to determine the concentration and purity of the DNA in the samples. Concentrations ranged from 70 ng/µl to 300 ng/µl
Part | DNA concentration |
GFP | 148,52 ng/µl |
LacZ | 361,65 ng/µl |
RecA | 98,61 ng/µl |
- Digestion of Minipreps for further cloning
We used the NEB restriction enzymes and buffers for setting up the digestions. Those were done as follows:
- 1 µg of DNA
- 3 µl of NEB buffer 2
- 3 µl of BSA
- 1 µl of each restriction enzyme used
- Water was added to reach a final volume of 30 µl
GFP (BBa_ E0240) and LacZ (BBa_K173004) were digested with EcoRI and XbaI. RecA (BBa_J22106) was digested with EcoRI and SpeI. After setting up the digestions, the reaction mixtures were mixed briefly, spinned down in a centrifuge (quick run up to 5.000 rpm) and then incubated on a thermomixer heating device for 1 h at 37 °C and stored at -20 °C afterwards.
- Annealing of SulA oligos:
psulA_fw:
aattcgcggccgcttctagaggggttgatctttgttgtcactggatgtactgtacatccaactcacc
psulA_rev:
ctagggtgagttactgtatggatgtacagtacatccagtgacaacaaagatcaacccctctagaagcggccgcg
The Oligos for the synthesis of the sulA-promoter were designed according to the sequence available in the partsregistry (BBa_K518010). By annealing of the oligos and ligation into a EcoRI/XbaI precut biobrick construct, they reconstitute the biobrick standard prefix completely and introduce the SulA promoter sequence.
Protocol:
5 µl of each oligo (diluted to a concentration of 100 mM) and 5 µl of NEB buffer 2 were added to 35 µl of water. After mixing, the reaction mix was heated up to 95 °C/5 min and then cooled down slowly to room temperature and then stored at -20 °C.
03/10/2012
- Information: Standard cloning - our Strategy
- GFP and LacZ were digested with EcoRI (E) and Xbal (X)
- precA was digested with EcoRI and SpeI (S)
- psulA was annealed, so it has the overhangs for EcoRI (as well as the whole BBa prefix) and a XbaI compatible overhang
- Gelelectrophoresis of the digested biobrick parts in order to extract the GFP and LacZ backbone as well as precA
Protocol:
In the meantime, the restriction digests were mixed with 6 µl of 6 x Loading Dye (fermentas). The whole restriction digest was loaded onto a 1 % agarose gel. Therefore, the agarose gel was prepared by adding 2 g of agarose to 200 ml of 1x TBE buffer and heated up in a microwave for 2 min/600 W. Thereby, the agarose was melted. Afterwards, the gel was stirred on a magnetic stirring device until the solution reached ~ 60°C and then the gel was poured. 10 µl of ethidium bromide were subsequently added by our supervisor Katharina Genreith (as EtBr is very toxic, we preferred our supervisor to do the handling of that when running a gel for the first time).
The samples were then loaded on the gel together with 1kb plus loading ladder (fermentas) and run for 1 h @ 100V. The expected bands can be seen on fig. 1.
Fig. 1: Schema of the gel we expect based on the length(picture constructed using the WinSerial Cloner software)
Fig. 2: Picture taken of the gel. All expected bands are visible
- Gel extraction of the indicated band (backbones for LacZ and GFP as well as precA insert) was done using a Qiagen gel extraction kit.
Protocol:
The bands were cut of the gel under UV light (caution: wear goggles in order to protect your eyes!) using a scalpel and the extracted band was put into a 2 ml eppi cup.
Fig. 3: Picture taken of the cut gel. This picture was taken after the required bands were excised for gel extraction
Afterwards, 600 µl of buffer QG were added to each gel band and the mixture was incubated on a thermomixer device at 50 °C and 700 rpm shaking for 20 min. Afterwards, 200 µl of Isopropanol were added to the mix containing precA (as precA is pretty short compared to the others, isopropanol is required). Afterwards, the whole reaction mix was loaded onto a gel extraction column and centrifuged for 1 min/max speed; flow-through was discarded. The column was subsequently washed with 500 µl of buffer QG and then 750 µl buffer PE, always centrifuging the column at max speed for 1 min at each washing step and discarding the flow-through. Finally, DNA was eluted in 20 µl of water.
- Concentration measurement of the pre-cut parts using Nanodrop
Part | DNA concentration |
GFP | 12.5 ng/µl |
LacZ | 15.11 ng/µl |
RecA | 6.0 ng/µl |
03/13/2012
- Ligation reactions were set up using 3-6 fold access of insert (precA) and 50 ng of each backbone (roughly).
- precA-GFP: 4 µl (~50 ng) GFP-backbone + 1,5 µl (~9 ng) RecA + 2 µl T4 DNA ligase buffer + 11,5 µl water + 1 µl T4 ligase
- precA-LacZ: 3 µl (~50 ng) LacZ-backbone + 1,5 µl (~9 ng) RecA + 2 µl T4 DNA ligase buffer + 12 µl water + 1 µl T4 ligase
- psulA-GFP: 4 µl (~50 ng) GFP-backbone + 1 µl annealed SulA-oligos + 2 µl buffer + 12 µl water + 1 µl T4 ligase
- psulA-LacZ: 3 µl (~50 ng) LacZ-backbone + 1 µl annealed SulA-oligos + 2 µl buffer + 13 µl water + 1 µl T4 ligase
- Incubation for 50 min at room temperature
- Heat inactivation of the T4 ligase at 70 °C for 5 min
- Afterwards, 10 µl of the ligation mix (chilled) were used for transforming 50 µl of E. coli Top10 chemocompetent cells.
03/14/2012
- Screening of the four different biobrick clonings done by colony-PCR.
Protocol:
A reaction mix was prepared containing 0.2 µl of each screening primer used for the screening, 9.6 µl of water and 10 µl of 2x PCR mastermix (fermentas). Finally, a colony was picked from a plate using a sterile pipette tip and was dipped into the PCR mix a few times. 7-8 clones were screened for each different cloning setup as follows:
- psulA-GFP and psulA-LacZ: primers psulA_fw and VR (standard sequencing primer) were used. Only in case psulA was successfully cloned into the backbone containing the reporter gene, we would get a PCR product. GFP would give a product of roughly 1000 bp, LacZ one of roughly 3500 bp.
- precA-GFP and precA-LacZ: primers VF2 and VR (standard sequencing primers) were used. We compared the product size of the different clones to the product size from the original vectors from the registry (only containing recA or LacZ). In case the cloning was successful, we should see a 200 bp shift in product size, which can be detected by gel electrophoresis.
- psulA-GFP and psulA-LacZ: primers psulA_fw and VR (standard sequencing primer) were used. Only in case psulA was successfully cloned into the backbone containing the reporter gene, we would get a PCR product. GFP would give a product of roughly 1000 bp, LacZ one of roughly 3500 bp.
The PCR program was done as follows:
94°C/3min||94°C/30s|60°C/30s|72°C/3min 45s||30x 72°C/10min|4°C/forever
Afterwards, 3 ul PCR product were loaded onto a 1 % agarose gel.
Fig. 1 Colony-PCR screen of precA-GFP construct. No detectable shift of any screened clone can be seen compared to the control. Screen has to be repeated.
Fig. 2 Colony-PCR screen of precA-LacZ construct. Most clones show a small shift upwards in product length. Furthermore, they show a second band at 1200 bp, probably due to unspecific primer binding.
Fig. 3 Colony-PCR screen of psulA-GFP (#3.1-3.8) and psulA-LacZ (#4.1-4.8). Only clones containing the psulA promoter can give a PCR product of 1000 bp (psulA_GFP) or 3700 bp (psulA_LacZ). Positive clones are i.e. #3.4, #4.2, #4.8.
The screening gave positive clones for all constructs (fig. 2, fig. 3), but not the precA_GFP construct (fig. 1). Therefore this screen has to be repeated using a larger number of colonies.
- 5 ml LB-Amp overnight cultures were inoculated for clones #2.3, #3.4 and #4.8.
03/15/2012
- The colony-PCR for the precA_GFP construct was repeated, now screening a number of 31 colonies. As control, again the amplicon of the original GFP biobrick was used.
Fig. 1 Repetition of colony-PCR for precA_GFP construct. Clones #6, 18 and 26 were positive (shift in amplicon length of ~200 bp).
3 positive colonies were detected, as they show a shift in band size of ~ 200 bp as expected by the introduction of the recA-promoter. Those were clones # 6, 18 and 26.
- O/n LB-amp cultures were inoculated for clones #18 and #26.
- Miniprep of the o/n cultures inoculated the day before for clones #2.3, 3.4 and 4.8 were done.
- concentrations measured using Nanodrop are all in between 70 and 140 ng/µl
- concentrations measured using Nanodrop are all in between 70 and 140 ng/µl
- Test digestions were performed in order to detect, whether the constructs would give the expected band patterns on the gel.
- #2.3 with EcoRI/BglI; as control the original LacZ biobrick was digested EcoRI/BgII as well
- #3.4 and #4.8 were digested NotI in order to see, whether an insert is present
Fig. 2 Test digestions for the constructs recA_LacZ (#2.3), psulA_GFP (#3.4) and sulA_LacZ (#4.8). All constructs digested showed the right bands (left gel compared to virtual gel with expected bands on the right). Construct #2.3 gave the expected shift of the lowest band (arrow) compared to the LacZ-control construct (original biobrick BBa_K173004) due to the presence of the precA promoter.
03/16/2012
- Miniprep of precA_GFP clones #18 and #26 inoculated the previous
- Measurement of DNA concentration with the Nanodrop gave 71 ng/ul for both constructs
- Measurement of DNA concentration with the Nanodrop gave 71 ng/ul for both constructs
- Test digestion of 1 ug of #18 and #26 with EcoRI/NcoI
- Band correct for both constructs
- All constructs (clones #1.18, 2.3, 3.4, 4.8) were send for sequencing to GATC using standard biobrick sequencing primer VF2
03/17/2012
- Sequencing results were obtained from GATC for the first 4 Biobricks we did
- Sequence was confirmed for all 4 constructs; cloning was successful!
Part | DNA Confirmation |
RecA-GFP | OK |
RecA-LacZ | OK |
SulA-GFP | OK |
SulA-LacZ | OK |
05/08/2012
Anealing of oligos for precB and precC:
Got oligo sequences from pubmed (looked for appropriate ATG and then took the following 70 basepairs as promoter sequence)
RecB:
fwd.:
aattcgcggccgcttctagagCCTGAAGGCTGGAAAGTGTGGGAGAACGTCAGCGCGTTGCAGCAAACAATGCCCCTGATGAGTGAAAAGAc
rev.:
ctaggTCTTTTCACTCATCAGGGGCATTGTTTGCTGCAACGCGCTGACGTTCTCCCACACTTTCCAGCCTTCAGGctctagaagcggccgcg
RecC:
fwd.:
aattcgcggccgcttctagagTTCACCCGGGGGCAGAGAAGGCGAGATGACCCGCCTGCATTGCCCGAATCGTCAGTAGTCAGGAGCCGCTc
rev.:
ctaggAGCGGCTCCTGACTACTGACGATTCGGGCAATGCAGGCGGGTCATCTCGCCTTCTCTGCCCCCGGGTGAActctagaagcggccgcg
Anealing-Protocol:
- 5 ul of each oligo (diluted to a concentration of 100 mM)
- 5 ul of NEB buffer 2
- 35 ul of water
- Mix
- Heat up reaction mix to 95 °C for 5 minutes
- Cool down slowly to room temperature (then store at -20 °C)
Ligation precB_LacZ / precC_lacZ:
Add contents in the following order:
- 12 ul water
- 2 ul T4 DNA ligase buffer
- 4 ul LacZ-backbone
- 1 ul precB / precC
- 1 ul T4 ligase
- leave 20 minutes at room temperature
- heat up to ca. 70°C to destroy ligase-enzymes
Transformation of precB_LacZ / precC_LacZ into Top10:
- Transformation-protocoll missing!
05/26/2012
Colony PCR:
Screening of the two different biobrick clonings done by colony-PCR.
Protocol:
A reaction mix was prepared containing 0.2 µl of each screening primer used for the screening, 9.6 µl of water and 10 µl of 2x PCR mastermix (fermentas). Finally, a colony was picked from a plate using a sterile pipette tip and was dipped into the PCR mix a few times. 12 clones were screened for each different cloning setup as follows:
precB_LacZ: primers VF2: and precB Reverse: were used. Only in case precB was successfully cloned into the backbone containing the reporter gene, we would get a PCR product.
precC_LacZ: primers VF2 and VR (standard sequencing primers) were used. We compared the product size of the different clones to the product size from the original vectors from the registry (only containing precA or LacZ). In case the cloning was successful, we should see a 200 bp shift in product size, which can be detected by gel electrophoresis.
The PCR program was done as follows:
94°C/3min||94°C/30s|60°C/30s|72°C/3min 45s||30x 72°C/10min|4°C/forever
Afterwards, 3 µl PCR product were loaded onto a 1 % agarose gel.
05/28/2012
Transferring the parts into standard registry plasmid pSB1C3:
- Restriction digest of 1 µg of each sample and of the standard backbone
- After 30 min SapI is added to the backbone digest
- After overall 60 min Qiagen nucleotide removal kit was used to purify DNA
- heat inactivation of remaining enzymes at 80°C
- concentration measurement with nanodrop
- Ligation
- heat inactivation at 70°C
06/02/2012
Inoculate:
Protocol: Constructs grown as overnightculture on agarplates:
- #5 precA_LacZ
- #7 psulA_LacZ
- #8 precB_LacZ
- #9 precC_LacZ
A reaction mix was prepared containing 20 ml LB medium and 20 µl Chloramphenicol (50mg/µl). Finally a single blue colony (except for #9) was picked from an agar plate using a sterile pipette tip and was dropped into a tube with 2 ml of the reaction mix.
Except for #9 we picked two colonies of each plate and inoculated separately. For plate #9, we picked four white colonies to check for basal expression.
After picking the colonies the tubes, in which the pipette tips where dropped, were put into 20 ml LB Medium .
Several hours later a miniprep of the grown cultures with the Qiagen Kit followed. DNA was eluted in TE Buffer.
Measurement of DNA concentration with Nanodrop:
Part | DNA concentration |
#5.1 | 16 ng/µl |
#5.2 | 6 ng/µl |
#7.1 | 46 ng/µl |
#7.2 | 57 ng/µl |
#8.1 | 84 ng/µl |
#8.2 | 91 ng/µl |
06/07/2012
Three parts were sent to the parts registry: You can find all BioBricks under: Parts
Calibration and Characterization
04/27/2012
Transformation of E.coli strain BL21 (DE3) with our constructs the samples were plated on LB agarplates with Ampicillin.
04/28/2012
Inoculation of overnight cultures in LB liquid medium with Amp from the plates.
04/29/2012
Experiment 1:
- day culture was inoculated with 1:30 dilution of overnight culture in LB with Ampicillin
- day culture was incubated for 3 h
- measurement of optical density using a photometer at 600 nm to confirm bacterial growth
- distribution of each 3 ml per sample to 6-well-plates
- 7 replicate plates one per time span: 0 s, 5 s, 10 s, 30 s, 5 min, 10 min of exposure time
- Exposure to UV-light in the Intas gel IX imager with the above-mentioned time spans
- Addition of 30 µl X-Gal (2mg/ ml) to samples #5, #7 (constructs containing LacZ) plates sealed with parafilm
- Incubation at 37°C, 50 rpm for 45 min, visual color change: LacZ samples became blue
- measurement of optical density at 600 nm of #5 and #7
Problem: maximum absorption of X-Gal at 615-650 nm interferes with measurement of bacterial density at 600 nm – no change in absorption although blue colour was visible
Experiment 2:
- overnight cultures centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 7 min
- pellet resuspended in 25 ml LB Amp
- The bacterial suspension is again exposed to UV-light with time spans of 0s, 20s, 60s, 300s, 600s.
- After the exposure X-Gal is added to the samples. Incubation at 37°C, 80 rpm
- first visible color change after 5 min in #7, #5 with X-Gal
- for a quantification the assays were plated out with duplicates on a 96w-Plate. LB medium was used as a blank reference. ONPG was added and the absorbance was measured with the plate reader
- ONPG was used because its absorbance maximum differs from the wavelength you use to measure the optical density
- after that we measured the optical density of our samples using the photometer to get the true expression.
05/27/2012
Repetition of the second experiment at 29/04/2012.
- overnight cultures centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 7 min
- pellet resuspended in 25 ml LB Amp
- The bacterial suspension is again exposed to UV-light with time spans of 10min 8min 6min 4min 2min 0min
- After the exposure X-Gal is added to the samples. Incubation at 37°C, 80rpm
Experiment failed.
No clear graduation between the samples of different exposure times was observed.
Possible causes: big differences in incubation time after exposure
Improvements in 4. experiment:
- 24 wellplate recA and sulA
- for 5 min in UV light then the first row was transfered to another well-plate. The rest went again for 5 min under UV light, then the second row, with now an time period of 10 min.
- Same procedure for all the other rows. Time periods 5min 10min 15min 20min 30min and a controll sample with 0min
Fig. 1: Picture of the color gradient visible in the X-Gal assays with different exposure times
Testing of the precA_GFP construct
- Overnight culture of precA_GFP was diluted 1:5
- 3ml of the culture were induced by UV radiation in the gel chamber for 30min
- The induced culture and 3ml of uninduced culture were incubated for 30min at 37°C / 80rpm
- After the incubation both cultures were compared using the fluorescence microscope
Fig. 2: Results of the GFP samples underneath fluorescence microscope
05/28/2012
Testing under real life conditions:
- culture of precA_LacZ and psulA_LacZ was centrifuged at 4000rpm for 8 min
- pellet was resuspended in LB Amp
- the samples were put into 2 6-well plates (3 ml/well)
- plates were tightly sealed, desinfected and put outdoor either into the sun or shadow for 75 min
- after 30 min incubation X-Gal was added to final concentration of 200 µg/ml the coloring of the samples were observed over time; intensity of the coloring in the wells were measured using the ImageJ software package
06/07/2012
Overnight cultures precB_LacZ were diluted 1:2 with LB Medium and transferred onto 24-well-plates, 500 µl per well. Duplicates were exposed to UV-radiation in the UV-chamber for 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min.
X-Gal stock solution was diluted 1:100.
After 1h incubation 50µl X-Gal was added to final concentration of 200 µg/ml. The coloring of the samples were observed over time. Intensity of the coloring in the wells were measured using the imageJ software package.
Fig. 1: All constructs in comparison